The N.Y. Times had an Op-Ed piece by tech multi-millionaire
Graham Hill who had an awakening: he once
had a fondness for stuff and lived large and now he doesn’t want the stuff and lives small.
How small? 420 sq. ft. On first
reading, your head starts singing “Oh happy day. Oh happy day. When Jesus washed.
My sins away.”
Mr. Hill heads a firm LifeEdited that designed his tiny apartment as a prototype to coax us into joining him in his newly calibrated
life. The renovation that transformed
an honest 420 sq. ft. of lovely undifferentiated space into 8 possible rooms cost around $300,000. The 8 rooms are made possible by
a multitude of hidden, stacked, double-duty load of high-tech preciousness
including a moveable wall that holds some of the rooms in suspension, a
collapsible table that seats 10 ($15,000), a desk in a drawer, drop down bunks for guests and a full-size media room/home theater achieved by moving
the magic wall all the way to another wall.
Mr. Hill wants to persuade us to edit the way we live and
consume because possessions are the problem not the solution. But instead of torpedoing
our old perversions in his prototype, his stupido apartment has glorified our stupido
old habits that made us feel empty in the first place. We wanted to get away from
our media room. Wasn't that the point?
The master plan of the apartment is to cleverly hide all the stuff we need to live there behind inscrutable cabinets. Life becomes a freak show of premeditation. You have to hunt for and unstack the induction burners to
cook. Un-telescope the table to
eat. Get your desk out of the wall to work. Push the freaking wall to get to
the television.
I like to read at a big table and I like to sort
out stuff on a big table and I like to put a small appliance (toaster/toaster
oven/electric teapot all on the table or a trolley nearby. I need the table
available all the time. The designers should have spent a day with their mothers and watched how they live. They would then skip the bs moveable wall and the drop down bunk beds
and the cleverness.
I could live with
a small bed, a table, a big easy chair, a flat bottomed bowl, a cup, a sharp
knife, a spoon, two good sweaters, three tunics, a half dozen leggings, a knit
hat, two scarves, a down
vest, a towel and those 18 washcloths from Wal-Mart that cost 3.95. For cooking, I would have a deep
frying/sautéing pan and a two-quart saucepan for rice, oatmeal, spaghetti, a
blender or small chopper for smoothies or soup. I would LifeEdit my food intake, too.
Many comments were left by other readers
of Mr. Hill’s essay. Here are a couple I liked a lot:
“'Not enough' is the
soul-grinding, joy-crushing truth for very much of this world's population.
We'd do better to tend to that rather than fetishize
our ability to more elegantly calibrate our own abundance.”
“I'm 82 and live on and with
the barest of necessities, for the less I have, the better I feel. I regularly
go through my small house wondering what else I can get rid of. Minimalism is
soothing, aesthetically appealing. I sometimes fantasize about living in a cell
like a monk - a cot, a table, and a window. “
"If I had lots and lots of money I'm quite sure that I'd quickly learn to
buy freedom and 'experiences' rather than stuff, too. That's what this article
is about."
“Knowing what I know now, if
I had my life to live over, at the age of 18, instead of sitting around
devising plans for a cluttered life, I would put a knapsack on my back and with
my dog I would leave the house and just start walking.”